Funny quote below, but who in the ML community called BS on Sam Altman when he said re: OpenAI in July that "he and his team of researchers hope to build artificial general intelligence, or A.G.I., a machine that can do anything the human brain can do"? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/22/technology/open-ai-microsoft.html …https://twitter.com/Plinz/status/1194403722563993600 …
-
i am just trying to show that you some pretty visible, well funded teams with lots of employees certainly claim that they are pursuing AGI; DeepMind has also often portrayed itself as trying to solve intelligence. you made it sound like I was making it up.
-
-
The Sutskever quote represents a viable hypothesis (text prediction may lead towards language understanding), even if I don't agree with it. The Forbes interpretation (an almost good enough fake may demonstrate understanding) is going too far.
-
Claiming that perfect symbol prediction leads to understanding of what the symbol represents equals asserting that all experienced physical world properties are reflected on those symbols; which is a very bold and utterly false
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.