until AI gets over its allergy to innateness, it’s not likely to get very far.https://twitter.com/TonyZador/status/1193176924497096706 …
-
Thank you for the advice - I will be sure to seek other sources of knowledge. My point is that using pre-trained nets *is* to use 'innate' knowledge. Our neural networks are also pre-trained, by evolution. I'm open to hearing an argument against this but I haven't heard one yet.
argument starts here: we really aren’t getting to anything like deep understanding using pretrained models.https://twitter.com/garymarcus/status/1192136091039649797?s=21 …
-
-
Well that's not an argument that AI is 'allergic to innateness', it's an argument that we haven't yet figured out how to produce the right kind of innateness. This 'allergic' thing seems to be a straw man.
-
allergic in that sense even when they have innateness they downplay it Rubik’s cube system for example included an innate symbolic solver that was downplayed solver; alphago’s title about mastering go without human knowledge was misleading etc. or see marcus-lecun debate
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.