Partly based on a McKinsey report, making predictions about future automation. Having read similar reports, I find the predictions highly suspect. Technology proceeds along extremely convoluted development paths, for one.
Wait, this is quite the tease @MFordFuture but I don't see any data in the article to support the claim. Which tasks? Which humans?https://twitter.com/MFordFuture/status/1191792203414167552 …
-
-
-
and even so, the claim is about now ("already")
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, etc.;)
-
Also clocks are *way* better than counting one-mississippi for keeping track of time
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I tweeted the default heading on Google news. I agree something like "entry-level jobs could be especially susceptible to automation" would be better. The data comes from the
@McKinsey_MGI report they cite, but as you say, I don't think it talks about AI already outperforming.. -
Imagine how many jobs have already been lost to Excel? The current narrow AI boom probably won't even register on the distruptometer.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In pre-entry-level tasks, pre-robots with pre-AGI outperform pre-humans.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Taken from the world renowned scientific website http://qz.com , not to be mistaken for http://qd.com or http://ev.com or whatever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He only identifies entry-level lawyers and actuaries in the 'already' category. But considering the full content of the piece, it's a bit of a odd headline lead.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.