You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'd argue no intelligence is innate. Just automatic behaviour that appears intelligent. Intelligence emerges (and can emerge very quickly) when the brain makes observations, stores and recalls in very specific ways. This is where the specific definition is required.
why would anyone who has ever seen a precocial animal walk within minutes of its birth argue that?
Conflating volition-driven intelligence with intelligence overall, perhaps? It seems to me that if the action is still a good fit for survival, that is to say the environment hasn't changed too much, the action is still intelligent regardless of whether it is automatic or not.
Can be an action intelligent? Or is rather the individual or artifact that executes the action intelligent depending on its completion and difficulty?
Please. Animals must have a certain amount of innate knowledge, not because it's required for intelligence but is needed for survival. It takes human infants years to learn how to walk. Our AGI will not need to survive in the wild, eat or procreate. They can learn everything.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
