.@azeem: "How do you define #AI?"
@GaryMarcus: "Artificial intelligence has to be broadly defined because intelligence itself has to be broadly defined. [...] Intelligence is multi-dimensional."
#defining #AI #intelligencehttps://hbr.org/podcast/2019/10/beyond-deep-learning-with-gary-marcus …
-
Show this thread
-
A general definition is a sure way to not help the discipline. There is a precise mechanism or process that drives all attention, memory formation and recall. It underpins everything. Only people who work on that will ever achieve AGI. Build something that CAN be intelligent.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
In our
@AGISI_ORG survey on defining (machine) intelligence, philosophers (among others) were actually in favour of a general#definition of#intelligence. The need to specify comes from#AI people depending on the context the application at hand is developed.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Partly explains why we are still so far from AGI. A precise definition is necessary to make general intelligence. the "general" I'm sure misleads. You dont make intelligence you make a mechanism that can make intelligence. Like a brain.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @markcannon5 @dmonett and
Well maybe. It might be that intelligence is an emergent property rather than a mechanistic property.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @azeem @markcannon5 and
That's for sure the case in populations like swarms, ant colony systems, etc.: intelligence *emerges* from the interactions & behaviour of their individuals. In the case of humans & other animal species,
#intelligence not only emerges but can also be innate, for instance.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dmonett @markcannon5 and
By innate, do you mean “hard coded”, so to speak, an manifested as such in neural architecture??
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @azeem @markcannon5 and
"Hard coded" like in the genetic material. Not nurture but nature dependent. And inherited.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I forget its name now but there is a great book showing how very simple sensor + motor + logic setups can be used to create behaviours that we would consider highly intelligent but they are all automatic and "dumb" in this sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
braitenberg vehicles
-
-
Replying to @GaryMarcus @dmonett and
Yes thank you. We should rule out this as an explanation of seemingly innate intelligence before we muddy our theories of general intelligence.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.