. @Ylecun are you arguing that your team has a robust solution to the problem of getting deep nets to understand the causal consequences of events as they unfold over time, or just pointing me to a toy model? Have you tried it on the examples in this thread?https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1188902027495006208 …
-
-
Replying to @GaryMarcus @ylecun
This all-or-nothing approach to progress is pretty silly. I'm sure it's a toy model, and I'm sure you'll find flaws with it, but that doesn't mean it's not progress.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
@Zergylord amen. This toxic and inane controversy seriously needs to stop2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
meanwhile i posted about 20 specific problems and encouraged the field to test on them; i await results.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It’s great to keep everybody in the community accountable to actual results and actual performance. It’s also highly necessary to also keep hype way down. At the same time, we shouldn’t minimize incremental results.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
that paper is interesting; i just don't think that it is reasonably characterized as rendering my claim false, let alone a "rearguard action". a fairer claim would be "there's some work on that in a limited domain, which I find promising." I'd be fine with that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.