I will gladly take up this argument. Looking for patterns in abstractions of abstractions and publishing papers on only the most amusing results is not "genuine understanding," but an argument of subjective taste -- a Rorschach, misapplied aesthetics.https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1188860232320999424 …
aside from which your reply is answering a different question. i didn’t argue that deep learning should be abandoned, i argues it should be supplemented. my choice of examples doesn’t speak that
-
-
We are in agreement. But if anyone wants to strawman your argument, I will gladly take on those strawmen in your stead.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"i didn’t argue that deep learning should be abandoned" This is why your ideas are wrong. If you truly understood the importance of generality in intelligence, you would argue that DL should be abandoned. DL is just as brittle as the rule-based experts systems of GOFAI.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.