Strawman alert: To extent @tdietterich directed this line at me "I object to the argument that says “Today’s deep learning-based systems don’t exhibit genuine understanding, and therefore deep learning should be abandoned" it is an absolute misrepresentation of my position. 1/2https://twitter.com/tdietterich/status/1188551504388452352 …
That's totally false. I have said the part about not abandoning deep learning part repeatedly in completely clear terms, one typical quote below, in this case from Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal; the entire book http://rebooting.ai is about deep understanding.pic.twitter.com/WBrlDnLlJo
-
-
What I'm saying is that the argument against deep learning methods is to difficult for the average layman to understand and make an informed decision. It's at the same level of difficulty as explaining why OpenAI solved the Rubik's cube manipulation problem.
-
it's really not hard to explain that the rubik's system moved hands but used a built in algorithm to decide where to turn the cube.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.