Hinton’s “favorite Gary Marcus quote” argues that pure #deeplearning fails to understand language. I stand it by it: no current #AI system can understand a stories, articles, etc.
If you disagree w the quote, I’d like to hear your thoughts why.https://twitter.com/rsalakhu/status/1187518370276614145 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GaryMarcus
The issue is that "understanding" is a sliding scale. Obviously today's AI systems (which are virtually all hybrids) understand some things and not others. There is plenty of room for improvement!
4 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @tdietterich
operationally: answer questions about who did what where when why and how. what motivations were, what agents intended to achieve, what obstacles they faced, what sequences of events was etc. stuff we expect of any normal reader. discussion: http://rebooting.ai chapter 4
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus
Yes, I agree that those are all things that are beyond the state of the art. The part of the glass that's half full includes lots of queries to google, alexa, etc. that are understood correctly, with significant contributions from deep learning.
5 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @tdietterich @GaryMarcus
Re the Google/Alexa queries, I’d not use the phrase “understood correctly”. There’s little to no understanding going on (although there is lots of pattern matching).
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Agreed. Try typing "largest lake not in North America" into Google and the results are dominated by the largest lakes _in_ North America. This is consistent with pattern matching to me ...
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @MaxALittle @Grady_Booch and
Heh, I keep a bunch of these. A sample in the images below show that you can get often a lot of value from keyword matching but understanding is lacking. The physics example shows that naive synonyms can mislead. The running is misleading, a theoretical maximum. Battery mythpic.twitter.com/YlCK2SxXXu
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sir_deenicus @MaxALittle and
(theoretical maximum 40 mph running speed should be read as not remotely physically achievable. Google answerboxes does things like this often; stitching things together that aren't related, need nuance or even contradict each other)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
want to give some examples?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.