If human-centered understanding is the gold standard, then how can we explain the fact that fake news fools humans as well?https://www.niemanlab.org/2019/04/a-cognitive-scientist-explains-why-humans-are-so-susceptible-to-fake-news-and-misinformation/ …
without deep understanding detecting fake news is hopeless and the internet remains a cesspool. see analysis here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/20/opinion/sunday/ai-fake-news-disinformation-campaigns.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share … https://twitter.com/dwilliams999/status/1187605107635937280 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
@AnnieDuke and i wrote a related essay:https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-problem-with-believing-what-were-told-11567224060 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps you are right, a higher level of understanding might increase the success rate, but I think the analysis of the fake news network might be more important, since a large amount of fake news fools humans as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who will then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.