2016: @GeoffreyHinton says we should stop training radiologists, because radiologists will soon be replaced by deep learning
2019: There is a shortage of radiologists. # replaced ≈ 0
What did Hinton miss?
by @garymarcus & @MaxALittlehttps://www.statnews.com/2019/10/23/advancing-ai-health-care-trust/ …
-
The point is that you are interpreting the quote and so am I. Neither of our interpretations was spoken by him. I admit that. You should, too.
there are many articles that were published at the time that interpreted the quote as @MaxALittle and I have; can you find any that interpreted it as you did?
@DrHughHarvey @DrLukeOR @AMPimaging @IvanKlyuzhin follow the radiology field more closely & might have thoughts
-
-
Seriously, you’ll invalidate my interpretation because no articles interpreted it that way. Any chance the press is biased to interpret quotes in the most sensational way possible?
-
any chance Dr Hinton is biased to say things in the most provocative way possible?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Further, his subsequent remark, one minute later, after “it might be 10 years” was that “anyway, we’ve got plenty of radiologists”. How does having a good supply of radiologists fit into your interpretation? If they’ll be replaced in a few years why would that matter?
-
we don’t, empirically; we have a shortage. you are grasping at straws.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.