They have some impressive results from purely vision as well. No need for quips.
-
I respectfully disagree -- at most, you could call their blog somewhat high energy, but why shouldn't it be? Writing formal manuscripts gets dull, and they provide plenty of those anyways. Blogs let them share their ideas in a less constrained form every once in a while.
4 out of 5 people who saw video or read blog probably thought system LEARNED to SOLVE (unscramble) the cube with high ACCURACY. Only if one read very the blog very carefully (or had a technical background) would one realize none of this was the case Many people felt deceived
-
-
This is a two + year cutting edge research project by a substantially sized team. Of course you need a technical background, or at least to do some reading, to understand the extent of limitations. I don't expect the full picture from the headline of results in other fields.
-
you don’t need a phd to understand any of the three limits i just pointed out. everybody understood them when i pointed them out in a tweet. they could easily have been clear; a simple title change could have reduced confusion by at least two.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.