the Rubik’s work IS great (as I noted below)—BUT the PR fits an ongoing @OpenAI pattern, of:
1. making deep R learning sound omnipotent when it’s not
2. minimizing value of innate contributions
3. minimizing value of symbols
4. making small advances seem larger than they arehttps://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1185680538335469568 …
read the full tweet stream, or just Google, people have been building robots to solve cubes for years.
-
-
Those robot hands use fully deterministic algos, have no perception and fail on every condition they are not explicitly programmed for. Their entire behavior is hard coded like industrial robot performing fixed sequence blindly. There is no comparison here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.