i ‘solved’ it as a child by faithfully following the rules in a paperback book; that feels kind of halfway between the options...
-
-
-
+1, that’s how I learned. which is what
@bradpwyble suggested earlier was most common. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I would go even one step further and argue that solving might be used for cognition alone. Finding a sequence that returns the cube to its default position is sufficient. Executing the sequence via object manipulation is just the implementation of the solution.
-
should have thought to include this in the poll i posted about an hour ago :(
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cognition is a bit vague. Options for following an existing algorithm vs creating your own would be more appropriate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"solving a Sudoku" conventionally refers to: a) finding a solution to a symbolic/combinatorial constraint system and eye movements to relevant grid locations. b) eye movements to relevant grid locations.
-
That said, the touch manipulation (whatever the method) is mind blowing (would also be for eye movements).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the fact that you even need to post this survey, and even a small % of replies which choose 'cognition' (let alone be a majority) demonstrates the ambiguity of the language, and thus failure in communication.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3. Limited cognition (procedure following) and manipulation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For the standard cube exact solutions areavailable, if those are used, then manipulation only
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.