Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GaryMarcus's profile
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus

Tweets

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

CEO/Founder of http://Robust.AI ; cognitive scientist, and best-selling author. New book: http://Rebooting.AI : Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust

garymarcus.com
Joined December 2010

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Oct 19
    • Report Tweet

    Since @OpenAI still has not changed misleading blog post about "solving the Rubik's cube", I attach detailed analysis, comparing what they say and imply with what they actually did. IMHO most would not be obvious to nonexperts. Please zoom in to read & judge for yourself.pic.twitter.com/R7HgnyyNRj

    3:08 PM - 19 Oct 2019
    • 866 Retweets
    • 2,365 Likes
    • amoiz RGPD-Internet-Cartographies Jeremias Grym Joshua Reagan Florence del Rey Heidi Malinga Fernando Paras Jain Yurii Andrieiev
    52 replies 866 retweets 2,365 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Oct 19
        • Report Tweet

        I will say again that the work itself is impressive, but mischaracterized, and that a better title would have been "manipulating a Rubik's cube using reinforcement learning" or "progress in manipulation with dextrous robotic hands" or similar lines.

        11 replies 24 retweets 313 likes
        Show this thread
      3. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Oct 20
        • Report Tweet

        @NandoDF you must have missed this tweet of mine

        0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
        Show this thread
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Daniel O'Connor‏ @Singularitarian Oct 20
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @GaryMarcus @OpenAI

        But dexterity is the hard/new part. When humans say they can solve a Rubik's cube, they usually mean they can mechanically follow the steps to a solution. The only non-trivial parts of making a robot do that are the dexterity and the vision, and the vision part is already solved.

        1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
      3. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Oct 20
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @Singularitarian @OpenAI

        actually they had to instrument they cube and the hand because vision was not adequately solved; that was on my list of points.

        1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
      4. 3 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. Joshua Landau‏ @TheRealVeedrac Oct 19
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @GaryMarcus @OpenAI

        This criticism is a mix of misleading and incorrect comments, though I agree the use of Kociemba's algorithm should have been stated more prominently in less technical terms.https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/dkd4vz/d_gary_marcus_tweet_on_openai_still_has_not/f4d8lmq/ …

        1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      3. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Oct 19
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @TheRealVeedrac @OpenAI

        i have replied to you on reddit.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. 3 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. Grady Booch‏Verified account @Grady_Booch Oct 19
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @GaryMarcus @OpenAI

        Ah....so this was not an off-the-shelf cube, but rather one that had been modified to contain electronic elements from which cube orientation could be detected?

        4 replies 4 retweets 63 likes
      3. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Oct 19
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @Grady_Booch @OpenAI

        Yep, a lot of the work was instrumenting the cube:pic.twitter.com/6ko5rRblg7

        3 replies 8 retweets 82 likes
      4. 3 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. Carlos E. Perez  🧢‏ @IntuitMachine Oct 19
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @GaryMarcus @OpenAI

        What's your take on OpenAI's GPT-2 that's been covered by the New Yorker? https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/10/14/can-a-machine-learn-to-write-for-the-new-yorker … .

        1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes
      3. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Oct 19
        • Report Tweet
        Replying to @IntuitMachine @OpenAI

        my (somewhat implicit) take on gpt-2 was here, a bit earlier:https://www.wired.com/story/adaptation-if-computers-are-so-smart-how-come-they-cant-read/ …

        2 replies 6 retweets 32 likes
      4. 1 more reply

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2019 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
      • Cookies
      • Ads info