Show this thread
some easy ways @openAI could have framed the paper if they wanted to avoid overhype: drop the word “solved” or just called the paper “manipulation of a complex object in the real world”https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1184593680281161728 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the paper title is accurate but ambiguous. "solving Rubic's Cube" for most people means executing a solution from a given position, using some strategy. But for math/cs folks, it means finding such a strategy. With dual audiences, title could have been better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.