Consideration of possible motives for going to the mass media with a "critique" of "deep learning" that says nothing that isn't already commonly understood by smart people working in or following the field. This isn't about science.
-
One survey after another, human equivalence around 2050 is the median expectation. Same result for lay and expert surveys. But very wide dispersion. Many practitioners expect much sooner, like 2030. Others very emphatically say it's way off, or never.
we can get there in 2050, but only if people in power stop criticizing and trying to supress those who point out limitations (sure signs of scientific ill-health)
-
-
So now you're being suppressed by "people in power"???
-
yes, frequent ad hominem attacks from field leaders who say I have no right to comment because my publications are primarily in other fields sure look that way to me.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.