NN for solving the Rubik's Cube would be like killing a mosquito with an artillery bomb: not necessary at all.
-
Hopefully MCTS band-aid will go away some day. However I felt blog+paper were very clear on using Kociemba’s algorithm. Also pleasant trend of describing open issues, i.e., (1) 80% attempts fail on hard config (2) custom cube communicates state (3) 13K years cummulative training.
Very clear in a single sentence ref 111 (!), not in opening sentences or tweet (or video?). Most readers would not have realized, given the framing.
-
-
Solving Rubik’s cube is indeed magical for non-technical audience but this has been done regularly including robotic hands. RL based approaches are also nothing new. For me, this wasn’t the most interesting part. I was more bummed by the fact it wasn’t fully vision based.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.