I would love to see this. Would be very informative for the general public.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s my man Gary! Let’s see it
@AndrewYang (TBH From Gary’s new book vs yours I think you agree about most stuff — he might even be a little too optimistic IMHO, e.g. you can beat him up on all that “AGI scientist” nonsense)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That would be an excellent book for politicians to read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great idea
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What would the pro and con of the debate be?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The debate is an excellent idea. Hope, the challenge is accepted
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AndrewYang is focused primarily on automation, which exists and progresses somewhat disjointly from general AI research (though the public is unaware of the distinction). I fear such a debate would amount to two ships passing in the night, with neither party getting much out.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This seems like grandstanding. Yang a politician concerned re automation, hollowing out of middle class etc. Not the specifics of AI or path to AGI.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
500 million dollars or 500 million Euros for Deepmind?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No snark, is Andrew Yang qualified to debate the topic?
-
he gets credit for giving the issues some attention
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.