advocates of #machinelearning, I am told that you all know that (current) #ML is limited. fair enough. but which limits are you willing to *publicly* acknowledge?https://twitter.com/NotSimplicio/status/1173373706674085888 …
-
If he'd ask for eg. more work at understanding the intersection between grammatical operations and perception and go into details, it might be more useful to the field and public debate.
but it still off the point of this thread, which is to assess how forthcoming advocates of ML are about limits. and how much they invite the inference that there are no limits, even if they know better.
-
-
I’d like to know more about what standard you are using to decide who exactly “advocates of ML” and what they collectively think. The vague sense that at least someone from a large vague set of people think X is hard to falsify.
-
self-identification & prominence (eg publications in the field). a prominent researcher recently told me that everyone in the field already in the field acknowledged all the limits that I point out; I doubt that they have done so publicly, & I am curious to see what happens here.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.