"If we focus on endowing machines with common sense and deep understanding, rather than simply focusing on statistical analysis..." I'll never understand this false dichotomy. Not sure how an understanding of the world is built up if not by statistical analysis.
-
Show this thread
-
This is from the Amazon description of
@GaryMarcus new book, though I'm guessing there's a high probability these are not precisely his words. Nonetheless, the same argument pops up in other places too.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @santoroAI
yes. of course the point of writing the book is that argument is too subtle to capture in a jacket description or a tweet.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus @santoroAI
It is so subtle I've never quite grasped it. 'Endowing machines with common sense and deep understanding' in the obvious way was tried for 50 years (it's the obvious thing to try first) and didn't work. What's different about your proposal now? (ps. I'll read the book...)
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FelixHill84 @santoroAI
Yes, please read the book. But also compare the argument you just made - “it’s already been tried, and failed” — to what might have been applied to deep learning in 2010.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus @santoroAI
That's a fair riposte! I suppose we must both agree that the best approach is not to do *exactly* what was done previously again - that's why I'm interested in your (book's) proposal for what to do differently.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
indeed the book is an effort to learn from history in order to glean insight into what might next be tried
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.