"If we focus on endowing machines with common sense and deep understanding, rather than simply focusing on statistical analysis..." I'll never understand this false dichotomy. Not sure how an understanding of the world is built up if not by statistical analysis.
-
-
Can you more formally define what these hybrid systems you have in mind are? I sense there's a lot of overlap between what DL researchers consider as architecture choices or other inductive biases.
-
In lieu of
@GaryMarcus definition, I would define a hybrid system as that having components that are both grown (i.e. trained like a neural network) and human-engineered (i.e. tree search). I argue that the latter can also be grown and thus it is a stepping stone. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Neuroscientists will unanimously agree that every specialized component of the brain is made of up of neural networks.
-
of course. as i have written numerous times, the question is not whether the brain is a neural network, but rather what *kinds* of neural networks the brain uses, whether they have anything to do with the tools in Ml, and what sorts of computations they implement.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.