@GaryMarcus In your paper "DL: A Critical Appraisal" you mention a test you did for generalization during 1998. Its is still a good generalization test? Which is in your opinion the best generalization test for a AI?
-
You read me wrong.
It was your “fifth thought” https://twitter.com/melmitchell1/status/1161776035060301825?s=21 … that colored how I read your thought as a whole; that seemed vastly too charitable to me. I still think that thought is too charitable, but I now understand your thread in a different way.
Fifth thought: Marcus correctly warns of the dangers of "overpromising". But is this fair, with respect to Deep Mind? Have they actually overpromised with respect to their technology? (I did see a quote from Shane Legg a while ago personally predicting AGI by 2020s ) 7/
) 7/
Show this thread
-
-
In your Wired article, when you talked about "overpromising", it was in the context of overpromising successful commercial products. This is how I meant it here.
-
I do think they are overpromising the practical utility of DRL, but time will tell.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.