“Alphabet’s DeepMind Losses Soared To $570 Million In 2018” @Forbeshttps://www.forbes.com/sites/samshead/2019/08/07/deepmind-losses-soared-to-570-million-in-2018/ …
-
I'm saying that DeepMind's horrible short term numbers isn't a bad thing. OpenAI likely has similar economic numbers. Should we also examine the cost of CERN's Large Hadron Collider?
note that i didn’t say they were “horrible” or make any value judgement in original tweet. others thought they were horrible and attacked me for saying so. ah, twitter...
-
-
"Losses" has a very specific connotation. You could have chosen a different word. Don't use words with specific connotations, and then pretend to be surprised when people infer the connotation from what you said.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ok, you didn't say they were horrible, but you claim that they were able to spend that much because of 'over hype'. Fundamental science should be given the luxury of undershooting its original targets.
-
no i didn’t say that
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"DeepMind's horrible short term numbers isn't a bad thing. OpenAI likely has similar economic numbers. Should we also examine the cost of CERN's Large Hadron Collider?" should we?
@Sam_L_Shead - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.