After reading the authors' reply, it sounds like the critics might have misunderstood some key points? In fact, it sounds like the critics might just have unknowingly replicated the original results?
this doesn’t make Nature look good, and I had a similar experience with them.https://twitter.com/slashML/status/1143319053404000256 …
-
-
-
Yes I agree. I get the critics’ concerns, but I found the author rebuttal and referee comments compelling.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Confirmation bias is a Scientific Sin ... and using ML (any tool for that matter) as a black box to be extract science is imo pseudo-science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also pervasive in medical applications, particularly those using
#EMR data.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Btw, have u seen Hinton's latest summary and opinions on CogSci symbols in nlp?https://twitter.com/rmarcilhoo/status/1143058812326285314?s=19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.