Nervous system (and the body) do have a great deal of pre-existing structure which can greatly narrow down how the organism interprets the signals from its interaction with the world. It is tuned to the structure of reality, at least within its way of life.
-
-
Maybe but for humans I believe that H(nature)<<H(nurture)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If that were true, then why do infants in their first year, have very similar progression in cognitive development?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Hmm. Same boot sequence, different games? But seriously, the environments are pretty similar across kids. And brain areas do go through some kind of a startup sequence. Critical periods.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
How does it work Retweeted How does it work
You are right about nurture/culture supplying most information. But it is only able to do so because human animal possesses pre-built mechanisms to absorb it.https://twitter.com/generuso/status/1104521274431279105 …
How does it work added,
How does it work @generusoReplying to @generuso @ATBollandsHuman and chimp babies start with only subtle differences. But only human brain has the tweaks which enable it to fully plug into the superorganism of human civilization. That fills it with unique gadgets, good and bad. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gua_(chimpanzee) …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Fully agree. I am not saying H(nature) is small.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
That's the big question -- what is the minimal set of constraints necessary to bootstrap open-ended human-like learning?
@ylecun hopes it can be something small and clever, others, like@GaryMarcus argue it is a load of stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @generuso @KordingLab and
There's no arguing that cultural learning is a big part of human intelligence. But in the first year, an infant learns almost the same kind of cognitive skills as every other infant. Why?https://medium.com/intuitionmachine/the-stepping-stones-of-agi-inspired-by-infant-cognitive-development-35ea0af61d23 …
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @IntuitMachine @generuso and
I believe that is predominantly because they all have similar human bodies. Secondarily, they all learn in a similar environment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Thus nature predominantly and nurture secondary. Yes, that's what I'm saying. Although a human infant goes through cognitive development outside the womb, it is because of an intrinsic capability.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
fwiw this is exactly what my 2004 book The Birth of the Mind was about
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.