The Chinese room argument applies to *all* functionalist definitions of linguistic intelligence. Nothing done with computers satisfies it, so perhaps it's not that relevant to the NLP community.
New @OpenAI system has some of the flavor of Searle’s Chinese room, but Searle presupposed “answers to the English questions are ... indistinguishable from those of other native English speakers” @OpenAI is SoTA on some QA tests, but no match for humans on story understanding.https://twitter.com/GaneshNatesh/status/1096874784330342400 …
-
-
-
Searle's argument is pretty much dualism. I haven't seen any credible non-dualist defenses.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Saying they're new invention was "too dangerous" was a master stroke. They've got everyone talking about an improvement that came about by throwing more data at their models.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True, however it’s an impressive step forward. I think running the same app on embeddings would be a good idea
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.