non gradient based DLhttps://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1080549287212314626 …
-
-
Replying to @dendisuhubdy
Reference? And why does it count as deep learning? (Some would say gradients are the essence of deep learning)
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus @dendisuhubdy
http://www.jmlr.org/proceedings/papers/v48/taylor16.pdf … not sure if this solves problems but there are already approaches w/o gradients. Just as GANs dont always necessarily mean cnn's, training may be without gradient based optimization.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @oskurovic @dendisuhubdy
It’s interesting.
@ylecun, as a person committed to gradients, curious your take on the link above. (And also whether you would still count it as deep learning.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't think Prof Lecun is committed to gradientshttps://github.com/facebookresearch/nevergrad …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Gary Marcus Retweeted Yann LeCun
Gary Marcus added,
-
-
time to get coding Gary
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.