Interesting. Norbert Hornstein thinks @GaryMarcus already concedes too much to empiricists in framing innateness in terms of "how much" vs. "what kind".
http://facultyoflanguage.blogspot.com/2018/11/whats-innate.html …
-
-
Absolutely. I think the (interesting) suggestion is that there's no reason to assume some workable 'general learning' machinery is less elaborate than something specialized.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Proposals are a dime a dozen. Show us your hybrid symbolic-AI/deep-learning app that knocks everybody's socks off. Until then, you're just hand waving. Nobody's holding their breath, I can assure you. Smart people know that neither DL not symbolic AI has any role to play in AGI.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.