Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GaryMarcus's profile
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus

Tweets

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

CEO/Founder of http://Robust.AI ; cognitive scientist, and best-selling author. New book: http://Rebooting.AI : Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust

garymarcus.com
Joined December 2010

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Blake Richards‏ @tyrell_turing 6 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @neuroecology @GaryMarcus and

      Quite. In fact, the data explicitly disproves any kind of grandmother cells. Consider for a moment the “Jennifer Anniston cells” that were reported in the media several years ago:

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    2. Blake Richards‏ @tyrell_turing 6 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @tyrell_turing @neuroecology and

      The researchers were recording from a *very* small subset of all neurons in the temporal lobes, and presenting ppl with a *very, very* small set of stimuli from the set of all possible stimuli. Yet, they found cells that responded to their stimuli. What does that tell us?

      4 replies 0 retweets 12 likes
    3. Adrien Peyrache‏ @apeyrache 6 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @tyrell_turing @neuroecology and

      We’ll, Rodrigo Quian Quiroga explained it very clearly. The Jennifer Aniston cell was actually a “Rachel in Friends” cell that also fire, at lower rate, for Monica and Phoebe.

      3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
    4. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus 6 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @apeyrache @tyrell_turing and

      Exactly what you would expect in neural network with winner-take-all localist output units...

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Blake Richards‏ @tyrell_turing 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @GaryMarcus @apeyrache and

      No, I disagree. Given the sampling issues I discussed (small % of stimuli and cells) it’s actually a guarantee of a distributed code.

      1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
    6. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @tyrell_turing @apeyrache and

      but how would the data look different? given the sampling that we can currently do, there is no pattern of data that you would accept

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Blake Richards‏ @tyrell_turing 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @GaryMarcus @apeyrache and

      If we it was hard to find neurons in higher-order areas that responded to stimuli, and when they did they only responded to one (note: cells in these studies usually responded to multiple stimuli), that would at least not falsify a localist account. The current data does.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @tyrell_turing @apeyrache and

      there are many connectionist models with localist output schemes (eg a node cat, anode dog etc) w variable activity levels that are thresholded by winner take all that behave exactly like this. localism is about what nodes stand for, not whether they have firing rates or real #s

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Blake Richards‏ @tyrell_turing 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @GaryMarcus @apeyrache and

      Those localist output schemes are kludgy, and NN modellers know that. A human’s output for ‘cat’ is very high D! And I never said it’s about firing rates: it’s the fact that cells respond to multiple distinct stimuli that disproves localism.

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Adam J Calhoun‏Verified account @neuroecology 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @tyrell_turing @GaryMarcus and

      sorry I've lost track here. what are you trying to argue @GaryMarcus? That there exist neurons in IT cortex that respond solely to one stimulus and no others (and maybe also that no other neurons in that area respond to that stimulus)?

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @neuroecology @tyrell_turing and

      they certainly are consistent w localist schemes that are standard in neural nets. more broadly: I wrote an article w Christof Koch: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/528131/cracking-the-brains-codes/ … plural in the title is key. i suspect brain uses many codes some local (perhaps groups of neurons); some distributed.

      6:49 AM - 7 Dec 2018
      • 1 Like
      • Jeannie Writing
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Adam J Calhoun‏Verified account @neuroecology 7 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @GaryMarcus @tyrell_turing and

          can you say *precisely* what you are claiming? This is where I'm confused

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus 7 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @neuroecology @tyrell_turing and

          not sure what you are asking. i am not saying that Aniston neurons never fire to anything but Aniston, but that they behave like localist WTA nodes. and that we can’t possibly rule out the existence of such things, based on very sparse data & poor understanding of neurosci

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info