“[Marcus 2012] is the first place where anybody said that deep learning ... wouldn’t be a panacea,” @GaryMarcus https://link.medium.com/XsEiDj7ZjS
Maybe you really don't know that that is the default belief by almost everyone. See a whole 1992 bookhttps://books.google.com/books/about/The_Symbolic_and_Connectionist_Paradigms.html?id=uAtWCpHoUxMC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button#v=onepage&q&f=false …
-
In 1999,
@DaveTouretzky asked on the connectionist mailing list "Is connectionist symbol processing dead?" The result comments were assembled into a thoughtful collection. I wonder if the responses would be any different today? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2448811_Connectionist_Symbol_Processing_Dead_or_Alive …pic.twitter.com/vOeR2fOZJo
It’s more alive now than it has been a while thanks to people like @AvilaGarcez @_rockt @egrefen @LittleBimble @NandoDF and others.
-
-
Computer symbolic processing is vastly superior to human capabilities. Despite this, a majority of the human like progress has come from connectionist. We need another term to capture the kind of fluid concept thinking that humans do. GOFAI shouldn't be raised from the dead.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.