I love these examples too, but there's something funny to me about describing these results as "fooling" DL (as authors suggest). These images are...extremely weird. Why does DL need to call an impossibly diagonal, cropped, photoshopped vehicle a "firetruck" to impress us?https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1068169331832315906 …
Column D is what matters; B and C were steps to getting there (as explained in the paper)
-
-
Huh, that's really not what I'm getting from it. They clearly (to me at least) emphasize *both* the standalone importance of the renders and also the ability to find natural images that behave similarly. I may be reading wrong, but this summary is not about natural images, is it?pic.twitter.com/IE7ZldOWuR
-
I will post my interpretation tomorrow morning on Medium; meanwhile, looping in
@anh_ng8 - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.