The recent debate (@ylecun vs. @GaryMarcus) might've given some the impression that psychology is unified around the symbolic approach. Highly recommend reading Linda B Smith for an alternative perspective that is equally applicable to AI/ML/DL research.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02124 …
-
I spent grad school years working with Newell's SOAR group, and later years with Anderson's ACT-R group. These were both highly symbolic, but no one in these groups that I recall ever felt the symbolic approach was enough. Newell's UCT book addresses some of this.
i certainly don’t think symbols alone suffice; that’s why i keep beating the drum for hybrids
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.