I think I just figured out why @ylecun is so defensive: Samsung’s Starcraft classical-AI heavy bot is (so far) still better than Facebook’s ML system. Results, discussions, links here, h/t @jackclarkSF http://www.cs.mun.ca/~dchurchill/starcraftaicomp/2018/aiide/ …
-
-
You do know that with your "just kidding" you're insulting the team who open sourced FB's StarCraft work, in front of all of your audience, forcing
@ylecun to step in to defend their work as you didn't present it fairly? Stop making research a zero sum fight for your own benefit. -
i am not following; please clarify in DM
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t think Starcraft is considered operational code for Facebook.
-
no i realize that but (a) it is still a striking contrast and (b) someone immediately posted a counterexample in production (ontologies) at facebook and (c) i posted one earlier today (text to speech for numbers) from Google.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The machine learning research enterprise seeks to replace hand-written code incrementally with learned components. The fact that these systems are mostly hand-written today doesn’t tell us much. It will be interesting to see which parts are the hardest to replace with ML.
-
you presume the answer to a question that is actual empirical and not yet answered
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
CherryPi is definitely not operational code.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you guys think there is potential in trying to formalize new computational paradigms and topologies in neuroscience and apply them in ML? I'm risking my MS thesis on it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.