Here’s what I have been saying since 2001: “Neural networks have to be supplemented with the key components of symbol manipulation in order to capture the compositionality of language and thought.” Agree or disagree, @ylecun? At our debate you said “diagree”. Your stance now?https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1065298686413078528 …
-
Good for you that you thought that in 2001. I did, too. The problem is that people --- Turing award winners! --- had been trying to actually DO this for 50 years before the two of us thought of it. They got nowhere. In 2001, I didn't have any ideas how to do better. Do you, now?
the credit i deserve such that i do is for publicly laying out the case in great detail and standing ground in light of endless ad hominem attacks.
-
-
"It's not the consequence that makes a problem important, it is that you have a reasonable attack." -- Richard Hamming. If you can't make the case that there is an attack now when there clearly was not one before, then the case is pointless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.