Just read the Berent & @GaryMarcus response. Summarizes familiar arguments against 1980s-style connectionism, but it would have been useful to see a discussion of more recent work, e.g.https://twitter.com/Joe_Pater/status/1048569045438541826 …
-
-
I agree that those are still good arguments, but your response seems to me to be too pessimistic about the odds of overcoming these issues in neural networks.
-
Perhaps neural networks with stronger inductive biases are not "real" networks anymore, but then it becomes an uninteresting terminological debate. I don't think as many people in the AI community these days really endorse the "associationist hypothesis" as you make it seem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Marcus loves to point out problems that most of us have known about for a long time. His solution: let's return to the baby boomer symbolic AI of the last century and let's study CYC. Pathetic.


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.