you really want to bet your life that this arises only in artificial scenarios? Good luck when a driverless car runs you over at a parade. (Ps“Harder” ≠ can’t be fixed; please try not to misrepresent my views next time.)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not sure why you think I said that. I said we should define "safe" for DL cars as "causing fewer deaths than human drivers". Obviously we're not ready to test that today. But country stats provide a benchmark. My guess is DL cars will only be accepted when safer than US drivers.
i think you said it because ... you said it above. “[deep learning] likely already better”
-
-
“Likely already better than Somalia” with more than 4K deaths per 100K vehicles per year. Of course I don’t know for sure if that’s true and we obviosly can’t do a contrlled experiment to find out.
-
Pardon the typos...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree neural nets can’t reason like humans and don’t learn the way we do either (we don’t need to see thousands of examples to learn what a horse looks like). And they are far from being safe enough to let on the road. But I’m not persuaded that driving requires AGI.
-
I would be totally satisfied if sthg else could replace reasoning & common sense for AVs. However, DL doesn't seem to be the answer.
.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.