What would you call a human who continuously gets better at a broader range of narrow tasks? Smarter? Picture a near-vertical line just entering the range of recognizably human concerns. Not extrapolating from ML: we have an existence proof - ourselves.
right on, @noelsharkey: machines haven’t really gotten smarter, just better at a broader range of narrow tasks.https://twitter.com/noelsharkey/status/1001005662334345216 …
-
-
-
I would refer human that could play Breakout with the paddle at y = 9 pixels but not y = 19 pixels to a neurologist, but
@dileeplearning has shown that one of the best known algorithms are time does exactly that. no healthy human is anywhere near that inflexible. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t get why even scientists and computer engineers would claim current AI technologies (DL, NN) are smart when all these tech do is making inferences by induction (made possible by the availability of huge datasets), without the really “intelligent” capability of deduction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.