"The main reason people keep benchmarking their AI systems against humans is precisely because AGI is the goal." but why? benchmarking Mary Shelley appears so human-centered in goals instead of outcomes; having just brain units on steroids is excellent. #Multiplicityhttps://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1000788194659618816 …
AGI ≠ human intelligence. but humans provide a guide to (some of) what is possible.
-
-
AGI = superhuman intelligence? but human guiding can be limiting. The missing disruption? So AGI = machine intelligence? but then human guiding is incorrect. To reach a human-centered higher (machine) intelligence appears as a paradox;
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.