This is why God is a person (agent), and thus deserving of the (philosophical) name "God"; pure agency is fundamental.
-
-
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings but that doesn't seem to be the same thing as the ideal abstract agent acting purposefully on the concrete agents2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee I don't know why you bring up "purposefully" here; I don't know what meaningful distinction it could be making; explain?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings if the ideal platonic agent maximises EU and "causes" concrete agents to do so, that seems like an unintended side effect2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee I don't think this idea of "goal" is fundamental in this way. But I think legibly arguing that requires a different medium.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings this way of acting on things doesn't seem unique to the ideal agent. it seems to apply to all mathematical structures.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.