@SamoBurja maybe convergent morality requires a 20 step philosophical argument and it's fragile so you get huge differences by failing one
-
-
-
@tipsfromkatee Intelligence isn't the same as caring about philosophical arguments. (suspect this isn't definitional nitpicking but unsure) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@SamoBurja also we don't even see clear convergence in predictive political questions despite that they have objectively correct answersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamoBurja then you'd see no real convergence amongst 17-correct-step philosophers and full convergence amongst 20-correct-step philosophersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamoBurja arguably smart people vary a lot more widely in their epistemology/metaphysics than ordinary people, who just follow common senseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamoBurja priors-based arguments like "people are different so their values are probably going to turn out different" seem more promisingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.