@St_Rev @tipsfromkatee @drethelin @simplic10 @MitchDokken So a just society has to correspond to some intractable political science?
-
-
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides@tipsfromkatee@drethelin@simplic10@MitchDokken I got no idea what you're talking about at this point, man.11 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@tipsfromkatee@drethelin@simplic10@MitchDokken You mentioned justice being incomplete. Rawls completes it in 2 lines if applied1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides@St_Rev@tipsfromkatee@simplic10@MitchDokken completes it in what sense? Implementation is everything.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@St_Rev@tipsfromkatee@simplic10@MitchDokken veil of ignorance proves that if unbiased a logical person would pick that as just1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides@drethelin@St_Rev@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Unbiased and risk-averse.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@Charmantides@drethelin@St_Rev@MitchDokken maximally risk-averse, and with respect to utility not money4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@simplic10@drethelin@St_Rev@MitchDokken Its the relative indifferences in wealth and utility that cause injustice.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Charmantides
@Charmantides@tipsfromkatee@drethelin@St_Rev@MitchDokken TBH injustice by that def'n doesn't sound too horrible.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@tipsfromkatee@drethelin@St_Rev@MitchDokken also have to contend with fact you can be logical and risk loving.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Charmantides @simplic10 @drethelin @St_Rev @MitchDokken rationality requires maximising expected utility, which makes you risk-neutral...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.