Money is a fairly simple concept. But it seems to generate legions of philosophical confusions.
-
-
@themattsimpson
@tipsfromkatee Schelling points are 9/10ths of ethics.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 @themattsimpson ...having fairness change the decision?" if not, then fairness might be "merely" about negotiation between agents1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee @themattsimpson OK, good framing. In a world of perfect altruists, it isn't necessary. However, "merely" is kinda weird.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee @themattsimpson I mean, explicit and implicit negotiation is a REALLY big deal in ethics. (Actual ethics, not gedankens)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 @themattsimpson but the question "what negotiation tactic has good consequences" is separate from "what has intrinsic value"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee @themattsimpson OK I concede the following: fairness doesn't belong in a utility function as just another value.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@simplic10 @themattsimpson then maybe we don't disagree. but i think this concession might affect how we should think about bird-watching.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.