@tipsfromkatee @MitchDokken Don't elide the difference in degree between "impose a cost on" and "ruin".
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken one might argue there's intrinsic value in not letting people benefit from such net-negative transactions1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken I missed that you had stipulated net-negative above. Sure, if it really is net negative I agree.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken E.g., if you are installing a wheelchair ramp to the summit of Mount Everest.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Commonsense ethics knows reasonable accommodations when it sees them.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken commonsense ethics knows usury when it sees it1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Would you care to summarize yr disagreement w me?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken usury is the difference between cost to lend and value to borrower that you can extract4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin@simplic10@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken But if there is net gain to both parties, no wrong has been done IMO.7 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@St_Rev @drethelin @simplic10 @MitchDokken and you can't tell if a transaction is unfair without considering the sum of all transactions
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.