@tipsfromkatee @MitchDokken E.g., if you are installing a wheelchair ramp to the summit of Mount Everest.
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Commonsense ethics knows reasonable accommodations when it sees them.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken commonsense ethics knows usury when it sees it1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Would you care to summarize yr disagreement w me?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken i'm not convinced that fairness is intrinsically valuable, or worth singling out over other intrinsic values here2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@simplic10 let's call all the non-fairness values together "happiness". then for fairness to intrinsically matter, it sometimes...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@simplic10 ...has to be the case that it's fair to take more happiness away from people than you yourself are gaining from the transaction1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee Right. I think I still do intrinsically value fairness, then. Example: you and I find a pie. Fair = split it 50-50.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 if (counter-intuitively) i care about us both to the same degree, and you like pie more, i think it's obvious you should get more2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@simplic10 probably i should still get some pie because of diminishing marginal utility
-
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee Sure, I agree. People are capable of working in both these regimes, depending on relationship & other factors.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.