@tipsfromkatee @MitchDokken I missed that you had stipulated net-negative above. Sure, if it really is net negative I agree.
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken E.g., if you are installing a wheelchair ramp to the summit of Mount Everest.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Commonsense ethics knows reasonable accommodations when it sees them.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken commonsense ethics knows usury when it sees it1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Would you care to summarize yr disagreement w me?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken i'm not convinced that fairness is intrinsically valuable, or worth singling out over other intrinsic values here2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@simplic10@MitchDokken i'm worried that your sense of fairness is merely proxying for standard utilitarian arguments for redistribution1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@simplic10@MitchDokken diminishing marginal utility etc1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken So you think I should stop treating fairness as terminal & reduce it to marg. utilities varying btw ppl?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@simplic10 i think it's not obvious that you shouldn't
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.