@tipsfromkatee @MitchDokken Wow, that's the long troll. :)
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken I don't think people value "non-usury" terminally though. They are just framing it wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken what's the relevant difference between usury and unfairness?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Non-usurious lending is unfair. Borrowing at no interest is taking something for nothing.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken ruining people's bird-watching clubs in exchange for a lesser benefit accruing to oneself sounds similarly unfair1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Don't elide the difference in degree between "impose a cost on" and "ruin".2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@MitchDokken one might argue there's intrinsic value in not letting people benefit from such net-negative transactions1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken I missed that you had stipulated net-negative above. Sure, if it really is net negative I agree.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken E.g., if you are installing a wheelchair ramp to the summit of Mount Everest.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee@MitchDokken Commonsense ethics knows reasonable accommodations when it sees them.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@simplic10 @MitchDokken ...be made that would leave people worse off on net if we weren't taking fairness into account
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.