@simplic10 particular weapons can have side effects, even side effects so serious as to justify disarming oneself when in the right
-
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@simplic10 but the mere claim that a weapon is "creepy as fuck" doesn't provide me with any reason to believe that this is the case here1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee Specific problem is ease with which spiral can occur based on initial denunciation. Runaway process.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee A said something heretical. B doesn't want to denounce A, but C is standing there. C might denounce both A & B, so better...4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee ...for B to denounce A to be safe. Same logic for n > 3.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@tipsfromkatee Ultimately you may have a whole society denouncing A even though none wants to.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee All that is required is that B not know whether C wants to & vice versa.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 someone at some point must have been actually second-order punishing, or else whose behaviour are we even evaluating1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee That works, but all that is *required* is (a certain level of) uncertainty about whether others will second-order punish.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@simplic10 about the exact ways in which you characterise the problems with witch hunts
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.