@tipsfromkatee , but Bayesianism is <1% of a theory of understanding.
@Meaningness so all one needs to do is think about a sufficiently large space of possible models, right?
-
-
@tipsfromkatee I don't think so. You run into limited computational/cognitive resources fast. -
@Meaningness yes if you're explicitly modelling them, no if you're just thinking about them in the abstract, as a normative standard - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@tipsfromkatee > both that it captures the relevant distinctions and that its size is tractable. -
@Meaningness sure, so one can have a bayesian theory of optimal problem space formulation - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@tipsfromkatee In the real world, most of the work of understanding things is in formulating the problem space correctly, which means >Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.