@Meaningness e.g. one doesn't use quantum field theory to predict the motion of ordinary objects, but any shortcuts one uses to predict...
@Meaningness and you can think about not-explicitly-probabilistic uncertainty with probabilistic tools
-
-
@tipsfromkatee > errors in formulating the problem space (ie possible events, possible causes, etc). Prob theory takes that as given. -
@Meaningness so all one needs to do is think about a sufficiently large space of possible models, right? - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@tipsfromkatee and this can lead to overlooking the impact of "unknown unknowns", because probability does not teach you to consider >Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.